Points on Closing Yard Trimmings to Mulch Center
2001 - 2002
- Frederick County equipment was deemed unsafe (by county) to work so
close to buildings (homes). They visited the site and modified &
established a particular position the grinder must point in to reduce
risk. However, once the industrial park is developed, it is unlikely
that this risk mitigation technique would work so site could not remain.
- Since county owned grinder broke down frequently, it was very
difficult to predict when it could be scheduled for grinding. Material
was therefore stockpiled in the limited space (as there was not space
enough to spread it out adequately), and smells from anaerobic bacterial
decomposition resulted which obstructed the quality of life for
neighboring homes. The active liming program was not enough to keep up
with the odor issues.
- Demand for mulch was not as great as supply of material. The
decomposition smells were deemed a health hazard by the state
government. Maryland Department of Environment initiated procedures to
force the Town to close the site permanently. The landscaper that the
Town worked a deal with could not haul the ground material as quickly as
the Town needed it hauled following a grinding.
- Since the Town could not control the grinder scheduling done by the
county, nor the landscaper's schedule for hauling, nor the odors, the
site was doomed.
- An extensive search for an alternate site, both inside and outside the
corporate limits of Town, in cooperation with both Frederick and Carroll
counties, yielded no options. The options that were offered were met
with 'nimby' (not-in-my-back-yard) protests. The Sanitation department
felt strongly that no government should force someone to live next to an
odoriferous nuisance, despite numerous letters from the community
stating strongly that it should.
- In lieu of a local site, a proposal was drafted for vendor pick ups
for a fee, but initially faced a mayoral veto with the argument that all
taxpayers should not have to pay for a minority's need for yard waste
hauling.
- In the interim the compromise became the mayor's effort to build a
list of vendors who would haul yard waste for a fee billed directly to
the requestor. Only one vendor responded to the request. Meanwhile
with fall approaching, there was a public outcry to maintain the leaf
pick up as an essential function covered by Town taxes.
- The mayor & staff decided to buy a grinder. The council decided to
pick up leaves within Town and hold on Town land for grinding to satisfy
complaints about dropping the service. No drop-offs would be allowed
and only leaves would be accepted thus limiting waste to Town generated
leaves only, and traffic to site by Town government vehicles only.
- Residents near the Town site complained based on possible future
problems, considering past experience with yard waste sites. They were
told by the council that this was a one-time interim solution until a
curb side program could be bid and executed.
- The council voted to allow the Department lead to bid out curb side
yard waste pick up based on the Town having picked up this waste prior
to the 1992 state mandate to institute a recycling program.
- The resulting bid was such that it could be adequately covered in the
Department budget, utilizing former yard waste site operating funds,
without risking tax increases. The council voted to accept bid and fund
the May and June 2001 pick ups to get the program started prior to the
new fiscal year, and the vendor indicated this could be accommodated.
Since a satisfactory compromise was reached, there was no mayoral
challenge. While most residents seem very pleased with this outcome,
there are some (mostly living outside of Town) who want the site to
continue operations. For out-of-towners, they must find alternatives
for yard waste including hauling it to Walkersville, Frederick or
backyard composting.
Submitted by Laurie V. Hager, Town Council 1998 - 2002
Contact us
Home